wasif twm case law Fundamentals Explained

wasif twm case law Fundamentals Explained

Blog Article

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

a hundred and one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it truly is handy for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to create an attempt to eliminate a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got reached to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it has arrived at these kinds of stage. Read more

Capital Punishment: Section 302 PPC delivers for that death penalty as being the primary form of punishment for intentional murder. The offender might be sentenced to death as retribution for taking the life of another human being unlawfully.

Deterrence: The concern of severe repercussions, which include capital punishment, is meant to prevent potential criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is very important in reducing the occurrence of intentional killings.

R.O, Office, Gujranwala plus the police officials did not inform him that the identification parade in the accused hasn't been conducted nevertheless. In the moment case, now the accused tried to consider advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image with the petitioner was widely circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity from the accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance to your accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly to the witness to determine the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer set a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and produced photos. Other than, the images shown within the media expose that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to cover his identity until eventually he was set up for an identification parade. Making photos of your accused publically, possibly by showing the same towards the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or program, would create doubt inside the proceedings in the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to make certain that there is no possibility to the witness to begin to see the accused before going into the identification parade. The accused should not be shown towards the witness in person or through any other method, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or perhaps the press or electronic media. Given the reasons elaborated earlier mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.

This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the more info delinquent officer in a very way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or even the finding and mold the relief to make it correct towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or even the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified because of the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

 Petitioner having been declared an absconder in this case for over one particular and a 50 percent year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may avoid standing trial and for this reason delay the prosecution from the case. The material on record makes the case from the petitioner falls under two exceptions towards the rule of grant of bail as mentioned previously mentioned.

The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge on the Judgment within time. Read more

thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that the moment the act of misconduct is founded along with the employee is found guilty after because of process of legislation, it is the prerogative with the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the varied penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed just isn't proportionate with the seriousness of the act of misconduct will not be satisfactory but the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in the structured and lawful manner. Read more

The regulation of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called regulation of necessity..

Performing a case legislation search may very well be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case law searches, which includes:

PACER allows anybody with an account to search and Identify appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register for a PACER account.

A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition to the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Improvement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court listened to the matter to be a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) on the Pakistan Constitution offers original jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to get up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.

The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and possible hazard to local residents. Finally, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, even though observing the general pattern supports that electromagnetic fields have negative effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out in the 1992 Rio Declaration over the Environment and Advancement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The dearth of full scientific certainty should not be used for a reason to prevent environmental degradation.